After Sethe’s rememory prompts a painful recollection of the
“butter-smeared face” (101) of Halle, she decides to head to the Clearing, the
place where Baby Suggs used to preach, in order to properly honor Halle’s
memory. In the Clearing Sethe recalls the uplifting and open preaching of Baby
Suggs in direct contrast to her and Paul D’s protective emotional nature. Baby
Suggs states when free from the bonds of slavery, a person should let their
“flesh weeps, laughs…dances in bare grass” (103). This image serves to contrast
itself with Paul D’s “tobacco tin” heart image by encouraging flesh to be flesh
as it was not allowed to be antebellum. The near rhyme once again calls to mind
a nursery rhyme, which lightens and establishes the positive nature of this
sentiment. Baby Suggs goes on to contrast freedom and oppression with a series
of negations stating “they do not love your flesh…eyes…the skin on your back…your
hands. Those they only use, tie, chop off and leave empty” (103). Morrison
catalogues various body parts in order to demonstrate the beliefs of Baby Suggs
and by example other slaves that the slave owner only deems the slave’s hands
as useful for mindless labor, while the vital parts of the body are considered
superfluous to the job. However, Baby Suggs goes on to implore her people to
love themselves and open up to love. Whereas Paul D shuts himself down to avoid
getting hurt, Baby Suggs believes this closed-off philosophy defeats the
purpose of being free and only encourages more physical and emotional
oppression.
I like how you compare Paul D's state of mind and heart to that of Baby Suggs. However, I don't see a topic sentence that shows the tools Morrison uses or the impact of such rhetorical devices. I think your second sentence could be a better topic sentence if you move away from context and more towards the significance in the contrast between the two philosophies. Also, you only have two pieces of evidence cited. If you provide a page number for the "tobacco tin" heart image and expand on that a bit I think you're analysis could be more in line with your topic sentence. I like the way you analyze each peace of evidence in a clear and succinct manner.
ReplyDeleteI also really liked the direct comparison of Baby Suggs and Paul D, but is there a way you can relate this to the large ideas of slavery in Morrison's novel?
ReplyDelete